|
Big Dots
The Everett Clinic
2007 Acclaim Award Recipient

The Everett Clinic’s team (front row
from left to right): Richard Rafoth, M.D., Associate Medical
Director, Quality and Utilization; Harold Dash, M.D., President;
Rick Cooper, CEO. (back row): Al Fisk, M.D., M.M.M., Medical
Director; Karen Nardinger, R.N.; Paige Nelson R.N., B.S.N., CPHQ,
Director, Quality Improvement
The Everett Clinic (TEC) is a community-focused multispecialty
medical group that provides a full range of medical services to a
3-county service area in Washington, with a population of over
800,000. With an active patient base of 225,000 patients, the group
has 14 practice sites, 8 urgent care clinics, and 2 outpatient
surgery centers. The organizational culture supports and reinforces
a clinic that is adaptive to a changing environment and responsive
to external factors, such as the IOM Aims. Patient service,
accessible locations, and convenience are hallmarks of the
organization.
TEC believes implementing the IOM Aims presents an opportunity to
add value to the patient care process as they work to anticipate
patient needs and proactively strive to improve their overall state
of health and well being. The level of care defined by the IOM Aims
encompasses the total care needs of the patient, as opposed to the
individual’s immediate or acute-visit care needs.
In 2005, TEC set out to determine how it could truly accomplish
adding value to the care provided. The focus was on two main issues:
the challenge of keeping the visit focused on the patient’s needs
(balancing their immediate needs with the long term) as well as
effectively measuring whether TEC was achieving the desired results.
To achieve the goals of further embedding a patient care philosophy
oriented toward the whole patient and measurement of results, TEC
began using a methodology known as “Big Dot.”
To drive change in that direction throughout TEC, the medical
group adopted a set of metrics defined as Big Dots, which parallel
the IOM Aims.
Goals
TEC is a physician-driven and -directed organization, which is
exceedingly proud of its standards of excellence and track record
that combines quality of care; cost-effectiveness; patient,
physician, and staff satisfaction; and solid financial performance.
The values of the organization are reflected in the following
“guiding principles” adopted by the Board of Directors in 1998 and
renewed subsequently.
|
CLINIC GUIDING PRINCIPLE(S)
- We do what is right for each
patient
- We provide an enriching and
supportive workplace
- Our team focuses on value:
service, quality, and cost
|
Within the construct of these principles, the Board of Directors’
goals and objectives for 2007 are:
|
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
We will improve our American Medical Group Association
(AMGA) patient survey response for “the visit overall” and
rank in the 75th percentile by:
- Implementing the “patient
friendly/physician efficient” visit
- Listening to the patient
through increased patient involvement in process
improvement and more frequent patient satisfaction
surveys
- Eliminating the perception
that “The clinic is closed” by ensuring open practices
are available at every clinic location
- Improving specialty
department access by aligning incentives
|
|
PATIENT SAFETY AND QUALITY
We will strength our “culture of safety” and quality
improvement by:
- Using Clinic Improvement
Systems to double the percentage of patients who are
optimally managed for their health registries
- Promoting the use of
“evidence-based” medicine to decrease variations in care
- Increasing use of the Culture
of Excellence reporting tool to minimize adverse
clinical events
- Implementing EpicCare
successfully in the summer of 2007
|
|
BEST WORKPLACE
We will be a premier employer with employee satisfaction
scores greater than the 75th percentile and physician
satisfaction scores greater than the 90th percentile by:
- Achieving greater staff
participation in clinic Improvement events (>30 percent
of staff and physicians)
- Improving our systems for
staff and physician training and development
- Evaluating skills and
performance-based compensation plans for staff
|
|
SECURE FUTURE
We will achieve greater than a five percent
profitability margin by:
- Using Clinical Improvement to
provide value to patients
- Reversing the trend of
decreasing visits per physician
- Managing the Epic project to
budget goals and timelines
- Opening physical therapy,
podiatry, and pathology services
|
In the table below, The Everett Clinic demonstrates how their Big
Dots goals and metrics are linked to their organizational goals, the
six IOM Aims, and implementation at the staff level.
|
METRIC
|
IOM
|
THE CLINIC
|
METRIC
|
FRONT-LINE STAFF AND PHYSICIAN
IMPACT/ACTIONS
|
|
Patient-Centered
|
Providing care that is respectful of an responsive to
individual patient preferences, needs, and values and
ensuring that patient values guide all decisions
|
The patients is satisfied with the care they received as
The Everett Clinic
|
Percent of patients “satisfied with their visit
overall”—answering excellent on the annual AMGA patient
satisfaction survey
|
- Standard work—One call does
it all
- Standard Work—After visit
planning
- Individual patient
prompts—Up-to-date and in control data
|
|
Effective
|
Providing services based on scientific knowledge to all
who could benefit and refraining from providing services to
those not likely to benefit (avoiding underuse and overuse)
|
A patient’s health and disease are managed appropriately
|
Percent of unique active patients who are up-to-date and
optimally managed in all registries in which they appear
|
- Standard Work—Standard
rooming process
- Individual practitioner
reports—Up-to-date and in control data
|
|
Timely
|
Reducing waits (and sometimes harmful delays) for both
those who receive and those who give care
|
The patient is able to access personal health care on a
timely basis
|
Internal weighted average of third available
appointment—primary care and specialty
|
- Redesigned and removed
barriers to scheduling
|
|
Safe
|
Avoiding injuries to patients from the care that is
intended to help them
|
The clinic will minimize the frequency of adverse
clinical care events which lead to or might least to an
adverse outcome
|
The clinic “accident” rate, the monthly frequency of an
event entered into the Risk Management database, and the
clinic “near miss” rate of a clinical incident referred to
Risk Management
|
- Culture of
Excellence—non-punitive reporting
- Ease of reporting
- Improved coordination with
Risk Management
|
|
Equitable
|
Providing care that does not vary in quality because of
personal characteristics such as gender, ethnicity,
geographic location, and socioeconomic status
|
The clinic provides its fair share of care for the
underinsured in the community
|
Percent “active” patients who are Medicaid and Medicare
|
- Monitor metric
- Ensure access
- Medicare Advantage
- CMS Demonstration Project
|
|
Efficient
|
Avoiding waste, in particular waste of equipment,
supplies, ideas, and energy
|
The clinic is a good steward in using its clinical care
resources to provide care
|
“Operating expenses” / total work RVUs
|
- Monitoring cost/RVU
- Redefine efficiency education
|
Implementation
The process of implementation of Big Dots at TEC was
multi-pronged. The Big Dot goals and metrics are now overarching for
the clinic as a whole, complementing the prior processes to drive
change at TEC. The historical perspective and the transition of goal
setting for 2007 can be depicted as follows:
The impact of adopting Big Dot goals was to provide the Board,
and in turn each management unit, a common perspective on their
individual goals. For 2007, the Board not only set specific patient
care, service, and business goals for TEC (now aligned with the Big
Dot goals)—which then filter throughout the organization and are
drivers in setting goals and accountability measures at the
operating unit level—but also provided a set of six overarching
organizational metrics aligned with the six IOM Aims. The results of
working towards Clinic goals are then reflected in these Big Dot
metrics—a measurement of results and accountability.
Results
The adoption of the six Big Dot goals and metrics has already
accelerated change at TEC. Focusing on the Big Dots at the Board
level, with regular review of those metrics, is driving change. The
Big Dots have:
- Facilitated communication of the
Board’s aims throughout the organization
- Captured the attention of the
practitioners
- Aligned organizational measures,
strategies, and projects
- Focused leadership’s attention on
monitoring the progress of process and quality improvement
efforts
The Effective Big Dot (IOM Rule 1—Care based upon continuous
healing relationships) is the first example of their success. The
results are beginning to show, as indicated below:
The Efficient Big Dot suggested that TEC could be missing the
mark, becoming less efficient. While not happy with this result, the
medical group is pleased that it now has a tool that forces it to
ask the question “why” and consider corrective actions. The
Efficient Big Dot is reported annually; TEC expects major, positive
change when 2007 data is reported.
TEC has used the Safe Big Dot to assist with the culture change
in the area of Patient Safety (IOM Rule 6—Safety as a system
priority). It encouraged the organization to review how it gathers
and analyzes information. As a result, TEC has expanded its
infrastructure and taken advantage of technology to improve the
collection of safety-related information; both potential incidents
and actual accidents. The results indicate that they are making
progress:
Moving the Big Dots in the right direction has required The
Everett Clinic to reassess all of their activities. Projects, many
of which were already in place, received renewed and increased
emphasis if they might effect a favorable change in the Big Dots.
And new projects are designed to focus on gaining positive results
in Big Dot metrics.
Website Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy
|